Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Frivolous complaint against Progressive Majority without merit

This didn't take long. The State Elections Board has issued an opinion that a group that is legally doing exactly what it said it would do hasn't broken any laws. From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel today:
Madison - The State Elections Board's staff lawyer on Tuesday found no evidence that the campaign arm of state Senate Democrats illegally conspired with private groups also working to elect as many Democrats as possible on Nov. 7.

Elections Board attorney George Dunst said in an advisory opinion that a Senate Democratic election strategy, obtained by Senate Republicans months ago, did not show that Democrats had broken any laws or rules against collusion.

State Republican Party officials had asked whether references in the Senate Democratic Campaign Committee document to Progressive Majority, an independent group also supporting Democrats, and other groups showed an illegal pattern of sharing polls or other research that was either illegal or must be disclosed on campaign-finance reports.

Progressive Majority did not break any laws. But someone did:
Also Tuesday, Roth Judd, executive director of the state Ethics Board, said he was reviewing a complaint by Sen. Mark Miller (D-Monona), whose campaign committee report was stolen from his belongings when he left them in a copy room adjacent to his Capitol office.

1 Comments:

At 3:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm no lawyer, but I wouldn't have thought that the group had broken laws. I would not have wasted time on that charge, but there must have been something that made them think they had a case, or perhaps they just wanted the publicity that such a charge would bring.

I think the point here is that the way the laws are currently written needs to be changed so that "Shadow Groups" as they are now being called are subject to the exact same laws that the parties are.

Right now it is a question of ethics, not law, and fairness to the American People, people who have a right to know who is "preaching" to them, what their motivations, sources of money and alliances are. That is not too much to expect in a democracy.

With the complexity of our legal system, the cleverness of our lawyers, and the power-lust of the unscrupulous and machiavellian among us, the statement "It's not ACTUALLY against the law" is not really a very high standard for behavior.
Especially for those who would aspire to be our leaders.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home